Link 1  

Link 2  

There are over 5,800 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament and no two manuscripts are identical. That alone should be enough to question the authenticity of the modern Bible. Not to mention that the manuscripts are in Greek while Isa (as) never spoke Greek. That alone should be enough. But even bible scholars have written about this if you’re looking for more scholarly sources:

1.⁠ ⁠Bruce Metzger, The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration (Oxford University Press, 2005)

2.⁠ ⁠⁠Bart D. Ehrman, Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (HarperOne, 2005)

3.⁠ ⁠⁠Emanuel Tov, Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible (2nd edition, 2001)

4.⁠ ⁠⁠Philip W. Comfort, Encountering the Manuscripts (2005)

Last thing is the Bible does include footnotes for interpolations. An example is Mark 16:9-20 where it admits these verses are not in the early Greek manuscripts and were likely added later on

1.⁠ ⁠Endings of the Gospel of Mark

The earliest manuscripts of Mark end abruptly at 16:8, with no appearances of the risen Jesus.

Later copies added longer endings (Mark 16:9–20) describing resurrection appearances, the Great Commission, and the ascension.

Modern scholars agree the short ending (to 16:8) is original.

KJV, Catholic, and Orthodox Bibles keep the long ending as canonical.

Modern Protestant and academic Bibles include it with a note explaining it’s a later addition.

Churches accept both versions doctrinally since the resurrection is confirmed elsewhere in Scripture.

—

2.⁠ ⁠The Trinity Verse (1 John 5:7–8)

The KJV includes the line:

“the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.”

This phrase (the Comma Johanneum) does not exist in early Greek manuscripts — it appeared centuries later in Latin copies.

Erasmus added it under pressure in 1522, and it entered the KJV.

Modern Bibles (NIV, ESV, etc.) omit it because it’s not in the original text.

Scholars and most churches agree it was a later addition, though KJV-only groups still defend it.

The Trinity doctrine doesn’t rely on this verse — it’s supported elsewhere in the New Testament.

—

Mark’s long ending and 1 John 5:7’s Trinity line were later additions found in later manuscripts.

Modern Bibles remove or footnote them for historical accuracy, while traditional versions (like KJV) keep them for continuity.

Other Materials  

Christian Questions Muslim On The Death Of The Prophet! Muhammed Ali 

AI Faith Journey 

Verses in the bible 

John 8:40 

In Islam, a common interpretation holds that Judas Iscariot was made to appear as Jesus, and he was the one who was crucified in Jesus’ place. According to this view, known as the “substitution theory,” God intervened to save Jesus from his enemies by substituting another person, who was made to look like Jesus, to be crucified. While Judas is the most frequently cited figure in this role, other figures have also been suggested in different Islamic traditions, such as a Roman soldier or one of Jesus’ apostles.

Link 

Link 

If Islam is True, Why Do Bad Things Happen to Muslims? 

Link 1 

Link 2 

This Hadith is Da’eef based on the below link

Hadith Link